On Oct 26, 2014, at 6:46 AM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > 20% coverage in lacnic low? how do ipv6 and dnssec compare (which is > damned sad)? over 2,000 in ripe and over 8%? how does that compare to > ipv6? > > arin, 388 and 0.7%, a joke.
LACNIC numbers (as a percent) are quite good, but my question was why only RIPE has the very impressive total count of ROAs. You can clearly point to ARIN's legal treatment of the risks involved, but that is not applicable in the APNIC case.... You don't feel there's any correlation between RIPE's IRR approach and their RPKI success? /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
