"NANOG" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> wrote on 10/22/2014 10:47:46 PM:
> The arguments against systemd that I've seen so far: > > 1) It's different so it's bad. > 2) There's a lot of code, there must be some really bad security > problems just waiting to happen, so it's bad. > 3) It doesn't do things the way we've always done them, so it's bad. > 4) The systemd developers are jerks, so it's bad. Hmmm. It seems that list is missing its most important item. As an impartial lurker, the primary objection I've seen is: 1. "Try to do everything" software is not optimal, and will lead to heartache. Joe
