"Interface" sure. But the dangers of replacing actual /addresses/ with things which are not is sufficiently well understood that even Van Jacobson ought to know about 'em, right? :-)
On September 5, 2014 10:27:18 AM EDT, Paul Ferguson <fergdawgs...@mykolab.com> wrote: >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >Hash: SHA256 > >On 9/5/2014 7:16 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >> How many Youtube subject tags will fit in *your* routers' TCAM? >> >> >http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/09/04/2156232/ucla-cisco-more-launch-consortium-to-replace-tcpip >> >> [ Can someone convince me this isn't the biggest troll in the >> history of the internet? Cause it sounds like shoehorning DNS /and >> Google/ into IP in place of, y'know, IP addresses. ] >> > >I didn't read it that way exactly, especially in light of this not in >the Wikipedia article: > >"Application-layer designs have also been proposed for deploying a >content-centric interface. This has benefits such as easier >deployment, backwards compatibility and more flexible delivery >support." > >https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Named_data_networking > >It's an interesting concept, but it ain't gonna replace TCP/IP, DNS, >or IP addresses anytime soon. :-) > >- - ferg > >- -- >Paul Ferguson >VP Threat Intelligence, IID >PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2 >Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2 >-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32) > >iF4EAREIAAYFAlQJyEYACgkQKJasdVTchbIF0QD9FFwhgIKz7ssn9olaQHhIO6rO >8JzN5RZoF1itLe4LSgEBANvgyc8qbZp5QhsTQBLxpPpoLF0JVLsgzbEs3xCqgQ76 >=kUKE >-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
