In message <20140729225352.go7...@hezmatt.org>, Matt Palmer writes: > On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:28:53AM +1200, Tony Wicks wrote: > > 2. IPv6 is nice (dual stack) but the internet without IPv4 is not a viable > > thing, perhaps one day, but certainly not today (I really hate clueless > > people who shout to the hills that IPv6 is the "solution" for today's > > internet access) > > Do you have IPv6 deployed and available to your entire customer base, so > that those who want to use it can do so? To my way of thinking, CGNAT is > probably going to be the number one driver of IPv6 adoption amongst the > broad customer base, *as long as their ISP provides it*.
Add to that over half your traffic will switch to IPv6 as long as the customer has a IPv6 capable CPE. That's a lot less logging you need to do from day 1. > > 3. 99.99% of customers don't notice they are transiting CGNAT, it just > > works. > > More precisely: you don't hear from 99.99% of customers, regardless of > whether or not they notice problems that are caused by CGNAT. People put up > with some *really* bad stuff sometimes without mentioning it to their > service provider. Like modems that introduce 2 second queuing delays the moment you have a upstream transfer like a icloud backup. Buffer @!#$!@#$! bloat! -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
