With enough horsepower, iptables+Linux is adequate for this, depending on your requirements.
I would want to put as little money as possible behind CGN in favor of moving as much as possible towards IPv6 instead. Owen On Jun 29, 2014, at 22:59 , Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+na...@eintellegonetworks.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > I am sure this is something that a reasonable number of people would have > done on this list. > > I am after a LSN/CGN/NAT444 solution to put about 1000 Residential profile > NBN speeds (fastest 100/40) services behind. > > I am looking at a Cisco ASR1001/2, pfSense and am willing to consider other > options, including open source.... Obviously the cheaper the better. > > This solution is for v4 only, and needs to consider the profile of the > typical residential users. Any pitfalls would be helpful to know - as in > what will and and more importantly wont work - or any work-arounds which > may work. > > This solution is not designed to be long lasting (maybe 6-9 months)... it > is to get the solution going for up to 1000 users, and once it reaches that > point then funds will be freed up to roll out a more robust, carrier-grade > and long term solution (which will include v6). So no criticism on not > doing v6 straight up please. > > Happy for feedback off-list of any solutions that people have found work > well... > > Note, I am in Australia so any vendors which aren't easily accessible down > here, won't be useful. > > > ...Skeeve > > *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd > ske...@eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com > > Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve > > facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ; <http://twitter.com/networkceoau> > linkedin.com/in/skeeve > > experts360: https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9 > > twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com > > > The Experts Who The Experts Call > Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
