Le 2014-06-30 09:05, Roland Dobbins a écrit :
On Jun 30, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Simon Perreault <si...@per.reau.lt> wrote:
Why? Cause that (per-subscriber limits on ports and memory) is exactly what we
recommend in RFC 6888...
<https://app.box.com/s/a3oqqlgwe15j8svojvzl>
I can't tell you how many times I've received frantic 4AM calls about NATted
wireless networks going down due to this sort of thing. It's a real problem.
If you're saying "NAT is bad", then sure, ok, but that's besides the point.
Otherwise, then I don't know what your point is.
Oh, actually I think I get it. You're trying to sell something.
Also, there are horizontal behaviors which are undesirable, as well.
Yeah, and let's not forget the diagonal ones either.
Simon
