On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 3:59 AM, Pieter Hulshoff <phuls...@aimvalley.nl> wrote:
> features they should have. I'll then try to build a business case to get the > product developed. MACsec is currently on the top of my own list, but I'll > gladly pass other ideas to my colleagues. what would be your key management strategy for the macsec version? given press / etc over the last 18 or so months it seems like folk with long-haul ether framing might be very interested in macsec for those links and NOT doing it by sticking some switch platform between the 2 routed endpoints. management of key material (and rolling and...) is probably interesting for them as well. -chris
