The point is that you can offer IPv6 to a lot of people using various instatntiations of 100.64.0.0/10 but using globally unique IPv6 addresses providing them full true internet access without NAT.
Yes, 6rd is a stopgap, but 6rd stopgap is better than multi-natted IPv4 only. Owen On Jun 20, 2014, at 07:22 , Gabriel Blanchard <g...@teksavvy.com> wrote: > 6rd is in my opinion a band-aid solution, I don't see the point of offering > IPv6 if it requires IPv4. native IPv6 should be offered where possible. > > We offer native IPv6 to all our DSL customers but only on an opt-in basis, > we're although unfortunately unable to offer IPv6 over Cable since we still > depend on a certain incumbent... > > -----Original Message----- > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of > jean-francois.d...@videotron.com > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2014 10:13 AM > To: li...@sadiqs.com > Cc: nanog@nanog.org; NANOG > Subject: RE: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) > > Videotron (AS5769) is offering 6RD (RFC5969) to all residential customers, if > their gear supports it. (DHCP option 212) > > (But our MGMT still calls it beta for now.) > > JF > > Jean-François Dubé > Technicien, Opérations Réseau IP > Ingénierie Exploitation des Réseaux > Vidéotron > > "NANOG" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> a écrit sur 2014-06-18 20:16:01 : > >> De : Sadiq Saif <li...@sadiqs.com> >> A : nanog@nanog.org, >> Date : 2014-06-19 12:43 >> Objet : Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion) Envoyé >> par : "NANOG" <nanog-boun...@nanog.org> >> >> On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote: >>> Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment. >> >> Any Canadian ISP folk in here want to shine a light on this dearth of >> residential IPv6 connectivity? >> >> Is there any progress being made on this front? >> >> -- >> Sadiq Saif
