Le 2014-04-18 13:35, William Herrin a écrit : >> Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT? >> >> Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all >> IPv6 firewalls. > > Your document specifies "Enterprise" firewalls. Frankly I think that's > wise. Consumer and enterprise users have very different needs and very > different cost points.
Over here we have no use for IPv6 NAT. We have our own PI space. I suspect many other enterprises would be in a similar situation. I totally get your position, but I don't see how it can justify an Internet-wide requirement. Simon
