On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Simon Perreault <si...@per.reau.lt> wrote: > Le 2014-04-18 13:25, Mike Hale a écrit : >> I agree with Bill. You can poopoo NAT all you want, but it's a fact >> of most networks and will continue to remain so until you can make a >> compelling case to move away from it. > > Does that mean all IPv6 firewalls should support NAT? > > Remember, we're aiming for a base set of requirements applying to all > IPv6 firewalls.
Your document specifies "Enterprise" firewalls. Frankly I think that's wise. Consumer and enterprise users have very different needs and very different cost points. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
