On Sat, 12 Apr 2014 07:56:01 +1000, Matt Palmer said:

> The interesting thing to me is that the article claims the NSA have been
> using this for "over two years", but 1.0.1 (the first vulnerable version)
> was only released on 14 Mar 2012.  That means that either:

>  * The NSA found it *amazingly* quickly (they're very good at what they do,
>    but I don't believe them have superhuman talents); or

You seriously think the NSA *isn't* watching the commits to security-relevant
open source?  Remember - it was a bonehead bug, it's *not* unreasonable for
somebody who was auditing the code to spot it.  Heck, there's a good chance that
automated tools could have spotted it.

Attachment: pgpumtq4kr1RX.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to