On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:37 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us> wrote:
> What sort of traction are you getting from that argument when you > speak with enterprise security folks? > Actually, I never even had to make the argument in our enterprise. Our cybersecurity organization already knew that overall NAT reduced rather than enhanced network security and had a deeper real understanding of security defense in depth than I did. I never had to convince anyone that NAT wasn't a security feature. It sounds like we have so many enterprises that do security poorly because many don't even understand the basics. Scott
