On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 8:31 AM, Joe Greco <jgr...@ns.sol.net> wrote: >> all successful security is about _defense in depth_. >> If it is inaccessible, unrouted, unroutable and unaddressable then you >> have four layers of security. If it is merely inaccessible and >> unrouted you have two. > > Time to give up two layers of meaningless security for the riches offered > by the vastness of the new address space.
Hi Joe, You'd expect folks to give up two layers of security at exactly the same time as they're absorbing a new network protocol with which they're yet unskilled? Does that make sense to you from a risk-management standpoint? -Bill -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
