Exactly right John. I think the term "owned" is a problem here. It seems to me that the terms would correctly be "holder" or who the address space was issued to or "user" being the end user using that space.
Wouldn't all of the holders be ARIN members unless grandfathered in? Steven Naslund Chicago IL -----Original Message----- From: John Curran [mailto:jcur...@arin.net] Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:36 PM To: Randy Bush Cc: North American Network Operators' Group Subject: Re: arin representation On Mar 23, 2014, at 6:53 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > two questions: > > o of the /24s in the arin region, what percentage are owned by arin > members? Randy - Happy to generate these - two questions for clarity. 1) Should we expand /16's and /8's into the corresponding number of /24's ? (or do you only want those blocks issued originally as /24's to be counted) 2) In terms of categories, we could go strictly with /24's held by ARIN members versus /24's held by non-members (and resulting percentages); note that would be predominantly ISPs since end-users assignments from ARIN are unlikely to be members unless they specifically opted to join. Alternatively, we could provide counts /24's under RSA, /24's under LRSA, and /24's legacy-no-agreement as the three categories of counts desired (and each percentage of the total) So, based on above, would you prefer the /24 space statistics as asked (member/non-member) or rsa/lrsa/legacy-no-agreement? > o of the address holders in the arin region, what percentage are arin > members? Will do. Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO ARIN
