On 12/18/13 8:03 PM, "Jon Lewis" <jle...@lewis.org> wrote:
>On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 15:12:28 -0800, "cb.list6" said: >> >>> I am strongly considering having my upstreams to simply rate limit ipv4 >>> UDP. It is the simplest solution that is proactive. >> >> What are the prospects for ipv6 UDP not suffering the same fate? > >Roughly 0%, but there's so little v6 traffic compared to v4, you probably >don't have to worry about v6 attack traffic yet...particularly if you're >not dual stack yet. :) -1 uninsightful Can't find any public data showing IPv6 as a percent of total bits, but it's certainly a meaningful percent of hits in many countries and networks. See also http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets- 00 which describes risks from IPv6 to people who think they are running an IPv4-only network. Lee
