On Thursday, March 7, 2013, Antonio Querubin wrote: > On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, Mukom Akong T. wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Antonio Querubin <t...@lavanauts.org> >> wrote: >> >> I don't think the business case is the issue. It is the timeline over >>> which the sense of urgency becomes important enough for most execs to >>> take >>> seriously. That's still a large unknown. >>> >> >> >> Why should they care about the timeline if they aren't convinced it is >> even >> worth doing? >> > > If they're convinced that it's not worth doing ever - then you're wasting > your own time. They may think it's not worth a lot of effort over the > immediate future but if the effort is spread thinly and integrated into > regular infrastructure upgrades over a longer period of time then that's an > easier pill to swallow.
You are talking about people who have already decided its worth doing and so they need convincing as to how early to start. I am thinking of people who need convincing in the first place. For such people, business case is their language, timeline comes after they are convinced > > Antonio Querubin > e-mail: t...@lavanauts.org > xmpp: antonioqueru...@gmail.com > -- Mukom Akong T. http://about.me/perfexcellence | twitter: @perfexcellent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ “When you work, you are the FLUTE through whose lungs the whispering of the hours turns to MUSIC" - Kahlil Gibran -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
