Nathan Anderson <nath...@fsr.com> writes: > Have you played around with the T.38 support on the SPA-1XX line? > Historically, it has been difficult to find a reasonably-priced, > bare-bones (1 FXS, no built-in router) ATA that also happens to do > T.38 well. PAP2T had no T.38 support at all.
T.38 support was the primary reason for choosing that model. Before the SPA-112, we used SPA-2102 which had the major disadvantage of being a router. It meant we had to log in to the box to enable provisioning on the WAN interface (and just hope that no one plugged a cable into the LAN). The SPA-112 is a much better solution. > SPA-112 price looks good, so I'm wondering what the catch is. So far only one bug found: Sudden 90% fax call failure rate in one specific setup with 4 ATAs, whereas all the ATAs used by other customers continued to work fine. Problem solved with firmware 1.3.1. /Benny
