On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Christian Kratzer <ck-li...@cksoft.de> wrote: > On Wed, 23 Jan 2013, William Herrin wrote: >> The algorithm will exclude the .0 and .255 external addresses from >> use, mapping the respective internal IPs to the other externals. > > why would you want to do that. .0 and .255 are perfectly valid ips.
Except for the machines which will refuse to talk to them. There's no excuse for post-classful stacks failing to work with those IPs but some do anyway. Enough that you don't want to waste your support staff's time dealing with the fallout. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
