On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Simon Perreault <simon.perrea...@viagenie.ca> wrote: > Le 2013-01-23 16:37, William Herrin a écrit : >> In fact, were someone to use those "worst current practices" to build >> some generic p2p VPN software, even old games could leverage it to >> allow someone behind a CGN to host. > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-behave-lsn-requirements > > A CGN that obeys these requirements will allow NAT traversal by virtue of > having an Endpoint-Independent Mapping behaviour. That is the BCP. Not port > prediction.
Even better. So, architecturally P2P compatibility with CGNs is a solved problem waiting only for the software to shake out. Expect some growing pains in the first generation CGNs which largely vanish in the second. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
