On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, Daniel Ankers wrote:
In other words, it makes sense to be able to support customers who won't move to IPv6 in the short-medium term, even though in the long term it's inevitable.
I agree, IPv6 isn't an answer to "we're out of IPv4 addresses" right now. So CGNAT44 i combination with IPv6 rollout makes perfect sense.
-- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se
