On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Keith Medcalf <kmedc...@dessus.com> wrote: > Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or > give user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the > goverment thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending > significantly more resources. > > Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have > google require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their > victims errr customers errr users.
you lost me in conspiracy theories, can you rephrase?
