Perhaps Googles other "harvesters" and the government agents they sell or give 
user credentials to, don't work against privately (not under the goverment 
thumb) encryption keys without the surveillance state expending significantly 
more resources.

Perhaps the cheapest way to solve this is to apply thumbscrews and have google 
require the use of co-option freindly keying material by their victims errr 
customers errr users.

Sent from Samsung Mobile

-------- Original message --------
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> 
Date:  
To: "John R. Levine" <jo...@iecc.com> 
Cc: nanog@nanog.org 
Subject: Re: Gmail and SSL 
 

Reply via email to