In message <cap-gugwtcoafenkqsxsssomxmy1sqs2ofaprv26ww+gfvfp...@mail.gmail.com>, William Herrin writes: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Randy <na...@afxr.net> wrote: > > - > > Well I want to add my 10 cents, > > I am a c++ programmer, and have been waiting for my isp to offer native ipv6 > > for ever. I got fed up with waiting and setup a ipv6 over ipv4 tunnel. So > > once I got that done, I spent only an hour updating my socket classes to > > support ipv6. I hadent done so before because I never had ipv6 access, * I > > don't release code without testing it first *. > > > > It wasn't difficult to update to ipv6, only some reading was needed, don't > > know what the fuss is =D > > Go test it against a dual stack remote host with the Tunnel's > addresses still configured on your hosts but packet filtering set to > silently drop packets on the IPv6 tunnel. Then work through the > implications of what you observe.
Go test your IPv4 code against a half broken multi-homed server. There is no difference. You either have good mutli-homed support or not in your code. With dual stack everything is multi-homed so no more ignoring the issue. > Regards, > Bill Herrin > > > -- > William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us > 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> > Falls Church, VA 22042-3004 > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
