In message <alpine.bsf.2.00.1211271621190.85...@murf.icantclick.org>, david rai strick writes: > On Tue, 27 Nov 2012, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > As for actually getting IPv6 at home or at work, there are so many ways > > to get that, thus not having it is a completely ridiculous excuse. > > bull. explain using a tunnel broker to anyone who isn't a network > engineer.
If they are writing network based code a tunnel broker should not be a issue. Tunnel brokers are not that hard to use. They are after all just a VPN and millions of road warriers use them everyday. > oh, and then make that work inside a typical F500 corp network with > restrictions on inbound and outbound ports, no admin user access to > desktop machines, etc. And if they are developing a product for the company there are procedures to get the changes needed to do the development. > Until the orgs that support the developers find that v6 is a priority > (through whatever means it happens - neteng/IT/etc pushing it up the chain > or politics/marketing pushing it down the chain) and it's functional on > the typical corp desktop, the typical corp application engineer is going > to have no motivation (not to mention no time in his/her schedule to > reengineer their platform) to support v6. > > > ...david (who hasn't read the rest of the thread. but is it really any > different than any other?) > -- > david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > dr...@icantclick.org ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail > http://www.asciiribbon.org/ > > > > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
