Please don't feed the bigoted hypocritical trolls. Regards, -drc
On Nov 25, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Randy <randy_94...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Just because it is from Iraq; does NOT mean by any streach of the imagination > that OP is a terrorist! > You need to get outside the box you are living in and learn to separate the > forest from the trees! > > You are "entitled" to you private-opinions. Don't post said-garbage on NANOG! > > I do take exception to such garbage; while other's might not. > > ./Randy > > --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ip...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> From: Network IPdog <network.ip...@gmail.com> >> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header >> To: "'Randy'" <randy_94...@yahoo.com> >> Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 6:43 PM >> The email address is >> from… auis.edu.iq = Iraq >> >> Sometimes persons living inside the box cannot see the >> forest because of the >> trees. >> >> PEACE >> >> >> Ephesians 4:32 & Cheers!!! >> >> A password is like a... toothbrush ;^) >> Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Randy [mailto:randy_94...@yahoo.com] >> >> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:52 PM >> To: Network IPdog >> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header >> >> WHAT??? >> >> Is this the extent to which This-List has DEGENERATED??? >> >> How dare you make such a horrendous accusation Sir? >> >> You may NOT like what OP has proposed. I don't either for >> more reasons than >> one! >> >> However, YOU are neither qualified NOR authorised to ask >> such an appallingly >> INSENSITIVE Question! >> >> Your so called "Freedom-of-Speech" DOES NOT translate to >> Character-Assasination on this or any other forum!! >> >> Follow me you ipdog? Find you own bitch to abuse. Don't do >> it here!! >> >> ./Randy >> >> --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <network.ip...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> From: Network IPdog <network.ip...@gmail.com> >>> Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header >>> To: "'John Adams'" <j...@retina.net>, >> "'Ammar Salih'" >>> <ammar.sa...@auis.edu.iq> >>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >>> Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 3:16 PM Et al, >>> >>> There is one simple question that needs to be asked! >>> >>> >>> Ammar Salih @ ammar.sa...@auis.edu.iq >>> Are you a terrorist? >>> >>> >>> >>> Ephesians 4:32 & Cheers!!! >>> >>> A password is like a... toothbrush ;^) Choose a good >> one, change it >>> regularly and don't share it. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: John Adams [mailto:j...@retina.net] >>> Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:20 PM >>> To: Ammar Salih >>> Cc: nanog@nanog.org >>> list >>> Subject: Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header >>> >>> Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt >> their location >>> data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol >> which is not >>> covered by commonly used encryption methods (i.e. >> HTTPS, which is up a >>> few layers in the stack) people can't be protected >> should this data be >>> monitored by a malicious intermediary. Think: Syria, >> China, Iran, or >>> any other government which will kill you for your words >> online. >>> >>> Application protocols sending GPS data under say, HTTPS >> protect the >>> end user from revealing their location to anyone on >> their path, >>> forcing an intermediary to look up the IP in a common >> geo database >>> which will be mostly inaccurate in pinpointing users, >> and hopefully >>> will save lives. >>> >>> Companies like Twitter, Facebook, and some parts of >> google are going >>> HTTPS by default for this very reason. >>> >>> This proposal is dead, you don't have the sense to lie >> down. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >
