I agree, this is entirely unacceptable discourse for nanog. Maybe you should take a closer look at your Ephesians quote there, Mister 'IPdog.'
-chris ________________________________________ From: Randy [[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 20:28 To: Network IPdog Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header Just because it is from Iraq; does NOT mean by any streach of the imagination that OP is a terrorist! You need to get outside the box you are living in and learn to separate the forest from the trees! You are "entitled" to you private-opinions. Don't post said-garbage on NANOG! I do take exception to such garbage; while other's might not. ./Randy --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Network IPdog <[email protected]> > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header > To: "'Randy'" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 6:43 PM > The email address is > from… auis.edu.iq = Iraq > > Sometimes persons living inside the box cannot see the > forest because of the > trees. > > PEACE > > > Ephesians 4:32 & Cheers!!! > > A password is like a... toothbrush ;^) > Choose a good one, change it regularly and don't share it. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Randy [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 3:52 PM > To: Network IPdog > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header > > WHAT??? > > Is this the extent to which This-List has DEGENERATED??? > > How dare you make such a horrendous accusation Sir? > > You may NOT like what OP has proposed. I don't either for > more reasons than > one! > > However, YOU are neither qualified NOR authorised to ask > such an appallingly > INSENSITIVE Question! > > Your so called "Freedom-of-Speech" DOES NOT translate to > Character-Assasination on this or any other forum!! > > Follow me you ipdog? Find you own bitch to abuse. Don't do > it here!! > > ./Randy > > --- On Sun, 11/25/12, Network IPdog <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > From: Network IPdog <[email protected]> > > Subject: RE: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header > > To: "'John Adams'" <[email protected]>, > "'Ammar Salih'" > > <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected] > > Date: Sunday, November 25, 2012, 3:16 PM Et al, > > > > There is one simple question that needs to be asked! > > > > > > Ammar Salih @ [email protected] > > Are you a terrorist? > > > > > > > > Ephesians 4:32 & Cheers!!! > > > > A password is like a... toothbrush ;^) Choose a good > one, change it > > regularly and don't share it. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John Adams [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Sunday, November 25, 2012 2:20 PM > > To: Ammar Salih > > Cc: [email protected] > > list > > Subject: Re: Adding GPS location to IPv6 header > > > > Your proposal doesn't even give people a way to encrypt > their location > > data; By moving geodata to a portion of the protocol > which is not > > covered by commonly used encryption methods (i.e. > HTTPS, which is up a > > few layers in the stack) people can't be protected > should this data be > > monitored by a malicious intermediary. Think: Syria, > China, Iran, or > > any other government which will kill you for your words > online. > > > > Application protocols sending GPS data under say, HTTPS > protect the > > end user from revealing their location to anyone on > their path, > > forcing an intermediary to look up the IP in a common > geo database > > which will be mostly inaccurate in pinpointing users, > and hopefully > > will save lives. > > > > Companies like Twitter, Facebook, and some parts of > google are going > > HTTPS by default for this very reason. > > > > This proposal is dead, you don't have the sense to lie > down. > > > > > > > >
