On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappydsl.net> wrote: > > On 11/20/2012 1:20 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Faisal Imtiaz <fai...@snappydsl.net> >> wrote: >>> >>> On 11/20/2012 12:10 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: >>>> >>>> it's acutally kinda nice that at least from CO -> building now >>>> there maybe more highspeed links... and maybe lower long term costs? >>>> >>> Be careful of what you wish for...., Yes, you get fiber from the CO to >>> the >>> Building... however there is also a very big side-effect... >>> Verizon is not obligated to provide equal access to Competitive providers >>> (CLECs) on this Fiber.... >>> >>> Thus, you are also looking a significantly reduced competition..... which >>> is >>> very likely to equate to a higher cost for end users. >> >> right, so in the end vz gets what it wants... a return to monopoly. >> >> >> conspiracy theories about verizon starting the floods? > > No Conspiracy theories... just the simple facts on where things stand, based > on current regulatory environment. > (I / We have no horse in this race....)
apologies, I forgot the emoticons after my last comment. i really did mean it in jest... I don't think VZ has harnessed weather-changing-powers. (yet).
