On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 7:05 AM, Anurag Bhatia <m...@anuragbhatia.com> wrote: > Hi Blair > > > I guess that's pretty much because they don't really wish to put any info > related to routers in public including location & circuit bandwidth which is > often given major networks in PTR. >
more over, what help is it? I'm of two minds really about this: 1) it's handy to say: the router in elbonia is being 'bad' 2) it's just as simple to say: 'your router with interface ip 1.2.3.4 is being bad' (or: "everything through 1.2.3.4 is forked... plstofixkthxbi!") It's often cited as a headache to maintain the PTRs (not really, automation ftw!) I think really it gets down to "how does it really help?" > Btw I guess you must be troubleshooting some routing issue. My experience > has been decent with them in past. They are usually responsive on the email > addresses mentioned in peering db for AS15169. also folk watch this list (and others)...though certainly the proper contact method is that which is in peeringdb. > http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=15169 > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Christopher Morrow > <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 11:52 PM, nanog <na...@afxr.net> wrote: >> > On 10/26/2012 7:13 PM, Blair Trosper wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm sure I'm bringing up a topic that's been brought up before, but I >> >> figured I'd have a go. >> >> >> >> Anyone from Google around that could answer to why there is no reverse >> >> DNS/PTR with most Google IP addresses (from traceroute, etc)? >> >> >> >> Alternatively, is there a server that can be utilized by the net >> >> operators >> >> community to at least get an answer on some of the IPs? >> >> >> >> It's very frustrating to contend with no PTR records in traces for >> >> troubleshooting and the like. >> >> >> >> Any information (off list or on) would be greatly appreciated. >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Blair Trosper >> >> Updraft Networks & North Texas GigaPOP >> > >> > Which particular address are you referring to? >> > I get PTR responses for the limited set of address I get from google. >> >> examples are good... I suspect he means things inside 15169's network >> that are not serving external people services: 209.85.243.114 >> >> for instance? >> > > > > -- > > Anurag Bhatia > anuragbhatia.com > > Linkedin | Twitter | Google+ > > >