----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gaurab Raj Upadhaya" <gau...@lahai.com>
> > So you're *REALLY* motivated on this "reduce the coverage" thing, > > then. > > you could say yes :), reduce the coverage per-AP. Most APs I have seen > will start failing with about ~100 associations and not to forget > about the max GE uplink they have. that's about 40-50 people at most > (being optimist). Really? 100 associations? On enterprise/carrier grade gear? Seriously? > >> g) we have a /32 and /20 (v6 and v4 respectively) address space > >> assigned by APNIC for this and other events in Asia (including > >> the APNIC meeting itself) so we use that. We used to have a v4 > >> /16 though before runout. > > > > I'm talking to someone from the Interop team; they have a dedicated > > /8. > > They gave that 45/8 back and kept 2 x /16 for themselves. I did not know that. Good on 'em. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
