(2012/09/11 20:52), valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2012 05:51:53 +0900, Masataka Ohta said:
>
>> Anything written in RFC1796 should be ignored, because RFC1796, an
>> informational, not standard track, RFC, states so.
>
> On the other hand, if you're relying on the fact that 1796 is informational
No, I don't.
It's Jimmy, Eliot and you who are relying on a non standard track
RFC to deny RFC3102 and all the non standard track RFCs, which is
the silly paradox.
> Standard or not, we have Christian Huitema, John Postel, and Steve
> Crocker
If you have some respect to them, don't involve them with your
silly paradox.
Masataka Ohta
