On 09/09/2012 23:24, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Oliver wrote: >> Just because something is documented in RFC does not automatically make it a >> standard, nor does it necessarily make anyone care. > > That's not a valid argument against text in the RFC proof read by > the RFC editor as the evidence of established terminology of the > Internet community.
you may want to read rfc 1796, and then retract what you said because it sounds silly. Nick
