----- Original Message ----- > From: "William Herrin" <b...@herrin.us>
> That's what firewalls *are for* Jay. They intentionally break > end-to-end for communications classified by the network owner as > undesirable. Whether a particular firewall employs NAT or not is > largely beside the point here. Either way, the firewall is *supposed* > to break some of the end to end communication paths. Correct, Bill. Hopefully, everyone else here who thinks DNAT is the anti-Christ heard the "largely beside the point" part of your assertion, with which I agree. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ashworth Baylink j...@baylink.com Designer The Things I Think RFC 2100 Ashworth & Associates http://baylink.pitas.com 2000 Land Rover DII St Petersburg FL USA #natog +1 727 647 1274
