Don't forget about XORP if you have any need for multicast routing ... On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> wrote: > Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a thread > from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations: > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Filip_BIRD_final_N48.pdf > as well as the NANOG thread: > http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/123027 > But have not found anything worthwhile on the matter over the past 2 years. > > Both Quagga and BIRD have developed since the comparison in 2010: > http://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=quagga > http://bird.network.cz/?o_news > > But has anyone performed a more recent comparsion? Does Quagga still suffer > from performance issues vs BIRD? Has anyone performed an RFC conformance > test to see who complies more strictly to all the various RFCs? > > If BIRD is so much better than Quagga why is there no instance at Oregon: > http://www.routeviews.org/ > > I also notice that BSD Router Project supports both: > http://bsdrp.net/bsdrp > How well do the two coexist at the same time? Any migration issues going > from Quagga to BIRD? Any feedback appreciated. > > We now take you back to cable wars :-) > > Thanks, > Hank > >
-- Ray Patrick Soucy Network Engineer University of Maine System T: 207-561-3526 F: 207-561-3531 MaineREN, Maine's Research and Education Network www.maineren.net
