Hello, I came across this site a few weeks ago
http://code.google.com/p/google-quagga/source/list Seems that Google (or at least some Googlers) are working on quagga, or worked as the last update is tagged July 2011. Main difference I see between Quagga and Bird, is that it is now possible to run ISIS on Quagga, but I did not perform a full comparaison of this two daemon. Guillaume 2012/8/22 Hank Nussbacher <[email protected]> > Sorry to disrupt the bad cabling thread, but I'd like to revisit a thread > from 2 years ago. I have read over the NANOG presentations: > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/**nanog48/presentations/Monday/** > Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Jasinska_RouteServer_N48.pdf> > http://www.nanog.org/meetings/**nanog48/presentations/Monday/** > Filip_BIRD_final_N48.pdf<http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog48/presentations/Monday/Filip_BIRD_final_N48.pdf> > as well as the NANOG thread: > http://www.gossamer-threads.**com/lists/nanog/users/123027<http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/123027> > But have not found anything worthwhile on the matter over the past 2 years. > > Both Quagga and BIRD have developed since the comparison in 2010: > http://savannah.nongnu.org/**news/?group=quagga<http://savannah.nongnu.org/news/?group=quagga> > http://bird.network.cz/?o_news > > But has anyone performed a more recent comparsion? Does Quagga still > suffer from performance issues vs BIRD? Has anyone performed an RFC > conformance test to see who complies more strictly to all the various RFCs? > > If BIRD is so much better than Quagga why is there no instance at Oregon: > http://www.routeviews.org/ > > I also notice that BSD Router Project supports both: > http://bsdrp.net/bsdrp > How well do the two coexist at the same time? Any migration issues going > from Quagga to BIRD? Any feedback appreciated. > > We now take you back to cable wars :-) > > Thanks, > Hank > > > -- Cordialement, Guillaume BARROT
