On 12 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Owen DeLong wrote: > I know my view is unpopular, but, I really would rather see PI made > inexpensive and readily available than see NAT brought into the IPv6 > mainstream. However, in my experience, very few residential customers make > use of that 3G backup port.
So what assumptions do you think future IPv6-enabled homenets might make about the prefixes they receive or can use? Isn't having a PI per residential homenet rather unlikely? It would be desirable to avoid NPTv6 in the homenet scenario. Tim