On 12 Mar 2012, at 19:30, Owen DeLong wrote:

> I know my view is unpopular, but, I really would rather see PI made 
> inexpensive and readily available than see NAT brought into the IPv6 
> mainstream. However, in my experience, very few residential customers make 
> use of that 3G backup port.

So what assumptions do you think future IPv6-enabled homenets might make about 
the prefixes they receive or can use?   Isn't having a PI per residential 
homenet rather unlikely?

It would be desirable to avoid NPTv6 in the homenet scenario.

Tim

Reply via email to