On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Jeff Wheeler <j...@inconcepts.biz> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Mehmet Akcin <meh...@akcin.net> wrote: >> if you know anyone who is filtering /48 , you can >> start telling them to STOP doing so as a good citizen of internet6. > > I had a bit of off-list discussion about this topic, and I was not > going to bring it up today on-list, but since the other point of view > is already there, I may as well. > > Unless you are going to pay the bill for my clients to upgrade their > 3BXL/3CXL systems (and similar) to XXL and then XXXL, I think we need > to do two things before IPv6 up-take is really broad: > > 1) absolutely must drop /48 de-aggregates from ISP blocks > 2) absolutely must make RIR policy so orgs can get /48s for > anycasting, and whatever other purposes > > If we fail to adjust RIR policy to account for the huge amount of > accidental de-aggregation that can (and will) happen with IPv6, we > will eventually have to do #1 anyway, but a bunch of networks will > have to renumber in order take advantage of #2 down the road.
Hi Jeff, We could use smarter prefix filtering than that. Which was proposed to ARIN a couple years ago. And failed. http://lists.arin.net/pipermail/arin-ppml/2009-November/015521.html Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
