On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Keegan Holley wrote:
+1
good to get a view from multiple sources even if they are automated. Should
be easy enough to filter for those that do not want them.
Plus it's helped me in the past catch a very massive (well, OK, it was a
less than a hundred unaggregated routes run off into the Internet) leak,
which forced me to learn about prefix-lists and such. So for those that
care enough about their own networks, it can be catalyst to learning
something new.
2011/10/15 William F. Maton Sotomayor <wma...@ottix.net>
On Sat, 15 Oct 2011, Lynda wrote:
On 10/15/2011 4:26 AM, Geoff Huston wrote:
While I am at it, does anyone read this report, or is this weekly report
also just part of the spam load on this list?
I read both of them, and also the Weekly Routing Report. I will regret the
loss, and consider all three to be far more valuable than 90% of the traffic
on the list.
+1
The reports are also useful to do a double-check on changes I've made from
the perspective of others (even if they are automated tools).
wfms
wfms
