>
> perhaps. but given a clean slate, would you:
>
> 1) live with more redundancy in the core and hope that you don't lose
> access to things downstream from a problem (or the problemchild
> itself)
> 2) think about a solution to provide OOB access via another infrastructure?
>
>
> Presume you can figure the costs as well so loss of a
> node/set-of-nodes SLA-wise is more expensive than 1yr of oob access?
>
> -chris
>
for those w/ OOB built on PSTN or other non-IP based fabrics,
how much would it hurt if the PSTN went away?
/bill
