On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote: > > I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience > with the IETF mailing list. It has had ongoing issues with > out-of-sequence delivery. Based on the Received headers, it's > seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the > AMS servers. It appears they may be trying something different > with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.
ietf.org is mailman and postfix. > -Larry > > > > >
