Hi, On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:32 AM, Jared Mauch <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > On Jun 20, 2011, at 8:30 AM, Bret Clark wrote: > >> Personally I would charge them for the /24 too, makes users think twice >> about the need for a block that large.
We do charge them for addresses already and cost doesn't come into play. We charge for assignments shorter than /28 to discourage IP hogs. > I would also give them a /64 per lan (alt: broadcast domain) as well to allow > them to start working with IPv6 for their email. > > - Jared They have inquired about IPv6 already, but it's only gone so far as that. I would gladly give them a /64 and be done with it, but my concern is that they are going to want several /64 subnets for the same reason and I don't really *think* it's a legitimate reason. Bear in mind that "legitimate" in this context is referring to the justification itself, not their business model. Thanks, steve
