On Jun 8, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >> >> On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: >> >>> Owen, >>> >>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two >>>> combined constraints: >>>> >>>> 1. No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers. >>>> 2. No ability to deploy those customers on IPv6. >>> >>> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4. Insufficient amount >>> of IPv4 addresses => LSN required. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Martin >> >> No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't >> need LSN. >> >> The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you >> can't >> deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4. >> >> > > cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ...
Doesn't solve the problem unless your users are all on cell-phone browsers that don't do a lot of the things most users do with real internet connections. Owen
