On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:09 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > > On Jun 7, 2011, at 9:59 PM, Martin Millnert wrote: > >> Owen, >> >> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> LSN is required when access providers come across the following two >>> combined constraints: >>> >>> 1. No more IPv4 addresses to give to customers. >>> 2. No ability to deploy those customers on IPv6. >> >> 2 has little bearing on need of LSN to access v4. Insufficient amount >> of IPv4 addresses => LSN required. >> >> Regards, >> Martin > > No, if you have the option of deploying the customers on IPv6, you don't > need LSN. > > The problem is that until the vast majority of content is dual-stack, you > can't > deploy customers on IPv6 without IPv4. > >
cough cough NAT64/DNS64 ... Cameron > Owen > > >
