On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum
<iljit...@muada.com> wrote:
> On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote:
>> I'm also a little surprised that you figured that there were no plans past 
>> the event -- much of the point of this is for data gathering -- did you 
>> figure folk were just going to gather the data and then ignore it?
>
> I asked the ISOC press people about this after they sent me their press 
> release but they never replied (they may have replied to my message but not 
> with an answer to the question). There is nothing on the ISOC site that 
> mentions anything happening after june 8.
>
> Of course I'm assuming individual participants will do stuff, but that 
> doesn't change that this IPv6 day as it stands now is a one-off event, not 
> the first step towards the Ultimate Goal.
>
Speaking only for myself, and not for anybody at all, I wouldn't be terribly
surprised if the 24 hour experiment goes smoothly to see it followed up
by a week-long trial round the next time.

If it doesn't go well, I imagine there will be much data analysis, figuring
out what needs to be fixed, and a "24 hour trial, take 2" once a sufficient
level of fixage has occurred.

Matt

Reply via email to