On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljit...@muada.com> wrote: > On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote: >> I'm also a little surprised that you figured that there were no plans past >> the event -- much of the point of this is for data gathering -- did you >> figure folk were just going to gather the data and then ignore it? > > I asked the ISOC press people about this after they sent me their press > release but they never replied (they may have replied to my message but not > with an answer to the question). There is nothing on the ISOC site that > mentions anything happening after june 8. > > Of course I'm assuming individual participants will do stuff, but that > doesn't change that this IPv6 day as it stands now is a one-off event, not > the first step towards the Ultimate Goal. >
Speaking only for myself, and not for anybody at all, I wouldn't be terribly surprised if the 24 hour experiment goes smoothly to see it followed up by a week-long trial round the next time. If it doesn't go well, I imagine there will be much data analysis, figuring out what needs to be fixed, and a "24 hour trial, take 2" once a sufficient level of fixage has occurred. Matt