On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 13:58, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljit...@muada.com> wrote: > On 10 mei 2011, at 22:31, Warren Kumari wrote: > >>> :: I applaud the first step, but I'm bothered by the fact that no second >>> step is planned. > >> Igor is right on both counts here -- 0.05% is definitely noticeable at these >> sorts of scale, > > Ok, removed my infamatory reply. But tell me how 0.05% is visible in the > up/down motions of traffic as it starts raining, there is something > especially good/bad on TV, people have to reboot because of a Windows update > or whatever.
Its the delta between v4 and v6 that is visible and significant. If some machine's addresses are all down hard, that is no problem in this scenario. -Scott
