I'm thinking both TCP and UDP, and for ICMP don't NAT's use the sequence number field to keep them separate ?
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Justin M. Streiner <strei...@cluebyfour.org>wrote: > On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Dorn Hetzel wrote: > > I was thinking today would be a good day to write an RFC for "fractional >> DHCP" where end-users can get issued say 1/64 of an v4 IP, say >> 155.229.10.20:1024-2047. Other users on the same DSLAM, etc behind the >> carrier NAT would have other shares of the same public IP. :) >> > > Would the end-user get both the TCP and UDP ports from their assigned > range? Also, how would you handle ICMP/ESP/etc... or would those be 'free > with the purchase of..."? > > jms > >
