It's also especially sensitive to icing induced packet loss. Owen
On Apr 1, 2011, at 7:30 AM, GP Wooden wrote: > I wonder on the carrier would survive a DoS attack ... > > ----- Reply message ----- > From: "Scott Morris" <s...@emanon.com> > Date: Fri, Apr 1, 2011 9:01 am > Subject: v6 Avian Carriers? > To: <nanog@nanog.org> > > Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a > recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner? > > I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;) > > Scott > > > On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote: >> I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I know. So if a >> v6 carrier swallows a v4 datagram does that count as packet loss or >> tunneling? >> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/ >> >> >> Marc >> >> >> > >
