On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Randy Bush <ra...@psg.com> wrote: >> Even more suspicious is the fact that there is no organisational >> information attached to the request and the sender used a gmail >> address. They supplied an Indian telephone number. > > it is about this point where i realize that i am overloaded with real > work, hit delete, and get back to that work.
I view this as an excercise in applied humor and in the potential scammer's RFC-1918 knowledge. "I can offer you 172.29.128.0/17 for the reasonable price of..." However, if Real Work is sufficiently important today, the amusement value of pursuing it is probably not worth it. -- -george william herbert george.herb...@gmail.com
