On Feb 28, 2011 12:28 PM, "Randy Bush" <ra...@psg.com> wrote: > > > It's hard to see v6-only networks as a viable, general-purpose > > solution to anything in the foreseeable future. I'm not sure why > > people keep fixating on that as an end goal. The future we ought to be > > working towards is a consistent, reliable, dual-stack > > environment. There's no point worrying about v6-only operations if we > > can't get dual-stack working reliably. > > facile but fallacious fanboyism > > o if ipv6 can not operate as the only protocol, and we will be out > of ipv4 space and have to deploy 6-only networks, it damned well > better be able to stand on its own. > > o if ipv6 can not stand on its own, then dual-stack is a joke that > will be very un-funny very shortly, as one partner in the marriage > is a dummy.
+1 Well said. V6 needs to stand on its own. Cb > > randy >
