there are two replies here. ---
Christopher Morrow <morrowc.li...@gmail.com> writes: > ..., what's the harm in dhcpv6? (different strokes and all that) only the egos and reputations of those who said that stateless autoconf was all ipv6 needed. (which is a small price to pay, according to me.) --- "Dobbins, Roland" <rdobb...@arbor.net> writes: > On Feb 28, 2011, at 10:47 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote: > >> Also don't forget privacy-enhanced addresses. > > Yes, which have extremely negative opsec connotations in terms of > complicating traceback. /64 csma subnets with low order 64 bits controlled by infectable pc's means we'll be blackholing by /64 when we blackhole in ipv6. it's no big deal. -- Paul Vixie KI6YSY
