On Feb 19, 2011, at 11:31 AM, Zed Usser wrote: > --- On Sun, 2/20/11, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: >>> So, in essence, you are advocating not to >>> interconnect the IPv4-only and IPv6-only domains in any way? >> >> I'm advocating not depending on any such interaction >> working as it's pretty clear that >> the available solution set is fairly broken. > Fair enough. This approach will, however, relegate IPv6-only networks to > second class citizenship status. Access to the "real" Internet will require > IPv4 and IPv6-only will be seen as the inferior choice, to be avoided as best > as you can. Not quite a ringing endorsement for IPv6, in other words. > > This position also assumes that there will be enough IPv4 addresses to go > around for everybody to dual stack. Anybody not so fortunate will simply be > left out in the cold. > > - Zed > > > Oh, I expect CGN/LSN to be connectivity of last resort, no question.
However, I don't expect it to work. I don't expect us to be able to resolve the issues with it, and I expect that to fairly rapidly serve as motivation for content providers to adopt IPv6. Owen
